![]() ![]() However, I believe these claims are straw men, and it seems to me that the Devezer et al. ![]() Tldr In a withering critique on the methodological reform movement, Devezer and colleagues attack and demolish several extreme claims. I hope the present version is more mature and balanced. Indeed, parts of my earlier post were interpreted as a personal attack on Devezer et al., and although I have of course denied this, it is entirely possible that my snarky sentences were motivated by a desire to “retaliate” for what I believed was an unjust characterization of my own position and that of a movement with which I identify. In addition, I have made a series of more substantial changes, because I could see how the overall tone was needlessly confrontational. I am grateful to everyone who suggested improvements, which I have incorporated to the best of my ability. ![]() This is a revised version of an earlier blog post that contained hyperbole, an unfortunate phrase involving family members, and reference to sensitive political opinions. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |